Saturday, December 12, 2015

Final Essay - Steven Lara

Steven Lara
Dr. Drissi
Eng. 105
11 December 2015
The Consequences of Neglect on the Development of Children
            In the novels, ”The Bluest Eye” and “Of Love & Other Demons”, child neglect is a common theme. Both texts display the negative impact that neglect has on the development of children. The characters Pecola and Sierva are the victims of neglect, consequently hindering their social relationships and self-esteem. The results of neglect consist of short-term and long-term effects, which can be both psychological and physical, on the character and mentality of the child that can be difficult to remove. This is a serious form of abuse that needs to be taken seriously and given more attentive care by those within the “home” of the children. In the novels, “The Bluest Eye” and “Of Love & Other Demons”, child neglect from Pecola’s and Sierva’s parents alters the way they perceive themselves and the world around them leading to their individual downfalls, which also sets an counter-example of what the concept of “home” should be for all families.
The character Pecola Breedlove, from Toni Morrison’s novel “The Bluest Eye”, is a black eleven-year-old girl that comes from an unloving, abusive and neglectful family.  In the beginning of the story Pecola was placed to live with the Macteer family because her father had burned down her house and she had nowhere else to go. Claudia Macteer explains, “The county had placed her in our house for a few days, … until the family was reunited”(Morrison 16). Experiencing separation from her family by the force of an external power because of an act caused by her father reveals to the reader the unhealthy condition in which the family exists. Her idea of “home” is now broken and there is now established boundaries for what a family is to her.
Traditionally, a mother is the parent who provides unconditional tender, love and care for her children through sensitivity, understanding and compassion. Although, this nurturer archetype is absent in this sociological context of the “home” for Toni Morrison’s “The Bluest Eye”.
Pecola’s mother Pauline is unaffectionate and abusive towards her and creates distance for their mother-daughter relationship. In a scene in the spring, Pecola spills berry cobbler in the kitchen of the house belonging to the white family that Pauline works for by accident, while also burning herself in the process. According to Claudia Macteer, “Mrs. Breedlove yanked her up by the arm, slapped her again, and in a voice thin with anger, abused Pecola directly”(109). An example of Pauline’s aggression and animosity for her daughter is shown by her abusive nature and lack of consideration for her daughter’s well being, even after have cried out and hopped in pain from the burns. Conversely, Pauline comforts the little white girl who lives there after she begins to cry. Pauline says to her, “Hush, baby, hush. Come here… don’t cry no more”(109). Pecola witnesses first hand her mother attending to another girl’s needs of comfort and security more than her own by her tone, words and demeanor when speaking to her.
Ideally, the father of the family is supposed to be the protector and guardian of their kin. Unfortunately, this role is unfulfilled in the Breedlove home and instead replaced with the infliction of damage.
Cholly Breedlove does not love Pecola the way a father should. One of the reasons he could not be the father he needed to be was due to his alcoholism. It is described that, “Cholly, by his habitual drunkenness” caused him to be violent. (42). Being an alcoholic drove Pecola away from him and limited the bonding time necessary for the two to build a strong relationship. It was during one of his drinking binges that Cholly, “wanted to fuck her-tenderly”(162). The action of a father raping his daughter is so unnatural and immoral that it inevitably creates a psychological wound that a child would never be able to heal from.
The concept of family and “home” for Pecola Breedlove is distorted, fragmented and undesirable. At a young age she experienced living in another family’s household and witnessed their love for each other that she did not have for her own. Even though the Macteer’s treated Pecola with hospitality they would not be able to fill the void of her family loving her the way a child deserves. Her unstable relationships with her family would prohibit her from creating healthy relationships with peers and other people. Her only friends Claudia and Frieda ended up saying they, “avoided Pecola Breedlove”(205). Pecola desired to be white with blue-eyes more than anything else. The Macteers, “knew she was fond of the Shirley Temple cup…to see Shirley’s face” (23). Since her self-esteem was low due to her ugliness and mother loving a white girl more than her. Pecola thought that if she had blue-eyes like Shirley Temple, because she was so popular and praised, she would be loved and wanted. “A little black girl yearns for the blue eyes of a little white girl”(204). Pecola wanted to be someone other than herself because she was not happy and had a low self-esteem. She wanted to be blue-eyed because that was her misconception of beauty. If she was beautiful then her parents could love her. Her parents’ neglect attributed towards her feelings of self-inadequacy because they did not acknowledge or accept her for who she was. Therefore, her continuous pain and suffering, ultimately lead to her insanity.
Child neglect is common and can be seen across different nations and cultures. Families with children of all social classes can be subjected to neglect. Hence, Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s “Of Love and Other Demons” takes on another perspective.
            Sierva Maria is a twelve-year-old girl from the South American seaport in “Of Love and Other Demons” that comes from a noble family that does not possess the proper standards of love and affection that a “home” requires for a child. Her father the Marquis and her mother Bernarda do not focus on their daughter as a priority but as an obligation they are forced to deal with. Sierva gets bitten by a rabid dog in the beginning of the novel, which leads to the unveiling of the empty relationships of the family. Her father, the Marquis, “thought of Sierva Maria not as his daughter but as hers alone”(Marquez 23). Her mother, Bernarda, “knew very well she did not love the girl and the girl did not love her”(16). Both parents did not want to affiliate themselves with their daughter even at her tender age of twelve.
            Sierva Maria had a stronger connection with the black slaves that lived in the shack of her household than her own biological parents. When it was her birthday she was with the slaves and believed that is when she is, “in her true home and with her true family”(12). The Marquis had one of the slaves trained to watch over and take care of Sierva on a daily basis. He delegated upon a slave the task to, “not to let the girl out of her sight, … treat her with affection and understanding (27).  When the Marquis tried to take Sierva out of the shack, “the girl resisted when he tried to carry her in his arms (25).  Sierva adapted to the black culture since she was around them the majority of the time and became able to, “sing in voices … in the various languages in Africa (12).
            The idea of the “home” is one that consists of love, companionship and belonging within the family. In “Of Love and Other Demons’ these elements of the “home” are not found within Sierva’s biological family but with the slaves, abandoning the typical concept itself.
            Sierva is part of a family that is considered royalty, which in term has reached the highest status within social class. Being of upper class coincides with financial stability and certain privileges normal people do not have for themselves. Ironically, the family lacks stability for the marriage of the Marquis and Bernarda as well as their relationship with their daughter Sierva. It would be understandable if Sierva’s parents were busy with other obligations but the neglect actually starts from her them not liking her. Marquis does not consider Sierva his daughter and Bernarda claims to not love her. Parents cannot provide the proper “home” for a child if they do not provide love for them. Hence, the Marquis assigns the most trustworthy slave to take their place as caregiver for Sierva and tend to her everyday needs. A child is being neglected by their parents, if their responsibility is being passed on to someone else. This grants the opportunity for Sierva to form a connection with people that are not her real family.
            Sierva assimilates the culture of the black slaves over the time being neglected by her own parents. Subsequently, developing resentment for her personal culture and family. Resisting to her father if logical since he had not fulfilled the role required to have obtained Sierva’s desire to be with him.
            Due to the rabid dog bite, Sierva is finally given attention and receives care from the doctor. It was believed that she had obtained rabies herself, which in reality was not the case. In the Marquis, Sierva sold the part to the doctor after barking in retaliation of her refusal to travel with her him in order to make her happy. She reacted this way because she did not want to leave her family amongst the black slaves where she felt belonging instead of her father whom she despised.  The neglect she received from her parents created the uncooperativeness that eventually lead to the doctor created problems that were never even there. If she never acted out by barking, the doctor would have reopened the wound and caused the infection that ended up killing her.
            In conclusion, support of the thesis through empirical evidence, insight and awareness has been provided through the characters Pecola Breedlove and Sierva Maria on the consequences of development in response to child neglect. In the case of Pecola Breedlove, physical abuse, segregation and lack of acceptance eliminated her sense of self and distorted her reality. Pecola suffered from neglect, therefore her needs were not being met in her “home” causing her to become self-loathing and mentally insane. For Sierva Maria, she was unloved by her parents and nurtured by outsiders of her family creating a barrier between them. When it came to communicating with her parents it was almost always unsuccessful and dissimulating. There was not any chemistry between Sierva and her parents thus she could not explain the situation of her bite properly without the Marquis taking extreme measures. As a result of child neglect, Pecola ended up mentally insane and Sierva ended up dead. Although these are both extreme cases of result in regards to neglect they are causes. For both characters the concept and ideology of the “home” was broken and unattained. A resolution for child neglect in general is to give children more than just the necessities for survival. Their development depends on the intangibles of providing a loving and accepting environment for the child to be raised in. If Pecola were shown acceptance from her parents perhaps she would not have desired to have blue eyes so passionately. If Sierva felt as close to her biological parents as she did her slave family maybe she would not have resisted her father by barking and have lived a long fulfilling life. These are the possible outcomes if neglect was never to occur for them. Ultimately, child neglect during the developmental stages can lead to serious psychological and sociological impairments that can affect that person’s future in a negative way.



            

Sunday, November 22, 2015

Veiling

After reading this article, I obtained a better understanding of why women veil their hair. The cloth women wear on their head is called a hijab or a scarf. They wear it to show that they dress and behave humbly. The majority of Muslim women wear the hijab, to obey God, and to be known as respectable women. The Hijab liberates women from being thought of as sexual objects of desire or being valued for their looks, or body shape rather then their intelligence. In Islamic culture women are almost forced to wear the hijab and if they do not wear it the women are not thought of as modest women. 

Veiling

This article about the freedom of veiling in eastern and western areas was a little difficult to understand at first, but after having finished reading the article, it made the reading more explainable. I do believe that women should have the freedom to veil their hair and if these women choose not to want to veil their hair, it should not affect what others think. Everyone has the freedom to make their own choices. Therefore, the public should not be threatened by the choices women make.

The Veiling

This article gives us insight on how people view veiling. Some believe it restricts the freedom of women. However in certain places, women do have the choice. It is interesting to compare other practices with ours. In our society, women are allowed to wear almost any type of clothing and expose their body as they please. In theirs, everything needs to be covered. This can be a reason why sometimes it is viewed as limiting freedom of women. It is just a practice that is different but doesn't always restrict freedom.

Eastern Veiling

Its interesting reading this article because I've actually discussed this topic before in my ethnic studies class last quarter.  We discussed exactly what the article is talking about, how western society views veiling as a means of segregating and separating women.  But women who wear these veils do not view it as this.  This veiling technique is used as an expression of religion and this article made me realize just how fast we judge others at first glance.

Veiling

I find this article very interesting and very empathizing, for I have lived in Shanghai, where since 1970s have been the first city to open up to the Western world, and one of the most modernized and westernized big city in China. This article discussed the topic of Westerners imposing their point of view and opinion onto other cultures, and in this case, the Middle Eastern countries. The action of veiling, to the Middle Eastern people, is seen as a sense of culture, and a method of increasing morality, compared to the “westerners” who are more revealing. What interested me the most is the idea that feminism, a movement started in 19th century, is viewed as the main cause of the “backwardness” of the Middle Eastern Islamic countries. The argument presented is that the continuous notion of the westerners, believing that veiling is a form of oppression of religion on women in Middle East, is an impediment on Islamic countries’ advancement. This belief is argued as a notion created by the west to dominate over east. 

Veiling

I found the article very insightful because it opens up a whole new understanding of veiling. While we are used to viewing veiling as a barrier between men and women caused by religion, this article talks about how women use veiling voluntarily as an expression of freedom. This completely changed my perspective of the Islamic religion and has made me become more open minded about other stereotypes of religion I see on a daily basis.